THE FORMATION AND REPAIR OF CISPLATIN-DNA ADDUCTS IN WILD-TYPE AND CISPLATIN-RESISTANT L1210 CELLS - COMPARISON OF IMMUNOCYTOCHEMICAL DETERMINATION WITH DETECTION IN ISOLATED DNA

Citation
Fa. Blommaert et al., THE FORMATION AND REPAIR OF CISPLATIN-DNA ADDUCTS IN WILD-TYPE AND CISPLATIN-RESISTANT L1210 CELLS - COMPARISON OF IMMUNOCYTOCHEMICAL DETERMINATION WITH DETECTION IN ISOLATED DNA, Chemico-biological interactions, 108(3), 1998, pp. 209-225
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy","Chemistry Medicinal
ISSN journal
00092797
Volume
108
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
209 - 225
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-2797(1998)108:3<209:TFAROC>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
We have studied the formation and repair of cisplatin-DNA adducts in w ild-type mouse leukemia L1210/0 cells and in the sublines L1210/2 and L1210/5, which differ in cisplatin sensitivity. In a colony-formation assay these sublines were 9- and 22-fold more resistant compared to L1 210/0, respectively. Cisplatin-induced DNA modification was studied at the cellular level by immunocytochemistry with antiserum NKI-A59 rais ed against cisplatin-treated DNA. Levels of nuclear staining immediate ly after a 1-h treatment were similar to those seen after a 23-h post- incubation In drug-free medium. Clear differences in DNA platination w ere found between the cell lines: immediately after exposure? L1210/2 and L1210/5 showed only 32 and 14%, respective, of the nuclear stainin g observed in L1210/0, and 48 and 13% after 24 h. In these experiments . adduct-specific nuclear staining was quantified as the area under th e adduct versus concentration curves (AUG). The formation and repair i n these cell lines of the bifunctional adducts cis-Pt(NH3)(2)d(pGpG) ( Pt-GG), cis-Pt(NH3)(2)d(pApG) (Pt-AG) and cis-Pt(NH3)(2)(dGMP)(2) (G-P t-G) were studied with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). N o relation between repair and resistance was observed. The results sug gest that differences in induced DNA platination levels, rather than i n repair, are responsible--at least in part--for the differences in ci splatin resistance. A mechanism such as an increased tolerance of the resistant cells to platinum-DNA damage may also be involved. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.