PROJECT ESCALATION AND SUNK COSTS - A TEST OF THE INTERNATIONAL GENERALIZABILITY OF AGENCY AND PROSPECT THEORIES

Citation
Dj. Sharp et Sb. Salter, PROJECT ESCALATION AND SUNK COSTS - A TEST OF THE INTERNATIONAL GENERALIZABILITY OF AGENCY AND PROSPECT THEORIES, Journal of international business studies, 28(1), 1997, pp. 101-121
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Business,Management
ISSN journal
00472506
Volume
28
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
101 - 121
Database
ISI
SICI code
0047-2506(1997)28:1<101:PEASC->2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Previous North American research suggests that aspects of agency theor y and prospect theory may explain decisions to escalate commitment to failing projects, This study explores the universality of these theori es in this context, The willingness of North American and Asian manage rs to escalate commitment to losing projects was measured using four g o/no-go decision cases. We hypothesized that Asian managers would be l ess willing to act in their self-interest (a lower agency effect), and would be more willing to escalate a decision in the face of negative framing (a stronger framing effect), We found that agency theory had s trong explanatory power for project escalation decisions in North Amer ica, but no explanatory power in our Asian sample, Framing effects wer e significant in both, but they were not significantly different.