In the absence of evidence that eradication of HIV from an infected in
dividual is feasible, the established goal of antiretroviral therapy i
s to reduce viral load to as low as possible for as long as possible.
Achieving this with the currently available antiretroviral agents invo
lves appropriate selection of components of combination regimens to ob
tain an optimal antiviral response. In addition, consideration of a pl
an for a salvage or second-line regimen is required if initial therapy
fails to achieve an optimal response or should loss of virological co
ntrol occur despite effective initial therapy. Such a planned approach
, based on consideration of the likely modes of therapeutic failure (v
iral resistance, cellular resistance, toxicity) could be called ration
al sequencing. Choice of therapy should never involve compromise in te
rms of activity. However, the choice of drug should also be guided by
tolerability profiles and considerations of coverage of the widest ran
ge of infected cells, compartmental penetration, pharmacokinetic inter
actions and, importantly, the ability of an agent or combination to li
mit future therapeutic options through selection of cross-resistant vi
rus. Available clinical end-point data clearly indicate that combinati
on therapy is superior to monotherapy. with clinical and surrogate mar
ker data supporting the use of triple drug (or double pretense inhibit
or) combinations over double nucleoside analogue combinations. Thus. 3
-drug therapy, should represent current standard practice in a nontria
ls setting. Treatment should be considered as early as practical, and
may be best guided by measurement of. viral load, with a range of othe
r markers having potential utility in individualism treatment decision
s. Therapeutic failure may be defined clinically. immunologically or,
ideally, virologically, and should prompt substitution of at least 2.
and preferably all, components of the treatment regimen. Drug intolera
nce may also be best managed by rational substitution.