While the medical community has accepted the role of H. pylori in the
pathogenesis of peptic ulcer disease, confusion persists among clinici
ans regarding when and on which patients to attempt H. pylori eradicat
ion, Thus, the objective for outcomes research in H. pylori is to help
clinicians identify which patients benefit from H. pylori eradication
and to determine the cost-effective strategies for their diagnosis, t
reatment and follow-up care, Economic evaluation of the impact of H. p
ylori infection has focused primarily on assessment of patient with do
cumented peptic ulcer disease, with particular attention to costs of p
harmaceuticals. However, drug costs are only one portion of the total
costs of management for patients with acid-related disorders and there
fore must be put in the appropriate context, Additional aspects of pat
ient benefit (e.g. patient satisfaction) and health-care expenditures
(e.g. over-the-counter medications, specialist visits, hospitalization
s) must be included in an evaluation of the value of a particular diag
nostic test, treatment, clinical guideline or disease management strat
egy, As a result of the high quality and quantity of data emerging, it
can be safely said that H. pylori eradication is cost-effective in se
lected patient populations: newly documented peptic ulcer disease; his
tory of peptic ulcer disease and taking maintenance therapy; and suspe
cted peptic ulcer disease using a serological test to guide initial tr
eatment. The role of eradication in other areas, for example, patients
with non-ulcer dyspepsia and screening to prevent gastric cancer, rem
ains to be seen. In addition to the performance of rigorous studies, r
esearchers must respond to the 'information overload' on busy clinicia
ns, by effectively disseminating their findings, If data generated fro
m outcomes research are not integrated into everyday clinical practice
, the enormous benefits associated with H. pylori eradication will not
be achieved.