TREATMENT AND OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION AND PRIOR CEREBROVASCULAR EVENTS IN THE THROMBOLYTIC ERA - THE ISRAELI THROMBOLYTIC NATIONAL SURVEY
D. Tanne et al., TREATMENT AND OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION AND PRIOR CEREBROVASCULAR EVENTS IN THE THROMBOLYTIC ERA - THE ISRAELI THROMBOLYTIC NATIONAL SURVEY, Archives of internal medicine, 158(6), 1998, pp. 601-606
Background: Patients with a history of stroke presenting with acute my
ocardial infarction (MI) are often excluded from thrombolytic therapy
owing to fear of intracranial hemorrhage. Few data, however, are avail
able on the risks vs the benefits of thrombolysis in patients with ari
acute MI and a prior cerebrovascular event (PCE). Methods: Data were
derived from 2 nationwide surveys of 2012 consecutive patients with ac
ute MI admitted to all 25 coronary care units in Israel during 1992 an
d 1994. Thrombolytic therapy was given to patients with a PCE at the d
iscretion of the treating physicians. Outcomes were compared between p
atients with an acute MI with and without a PCE and between patients w
ith a PCE treated with or excluded from thrombolysis. Results: Patient
s with a PCE (n=115 [6%]) were older, with higher rates of atheroscler
otic risk factors and in-hospital complications than their counterpart
s without a prior event (n=1897). They were treated less often with th
rombolysis or mechanical reperfusion. The 1-year mortality rates were
higher among patients with a PCE (28% vs 19%, P<.01), but not after mu
ltivariate adjustments for clinical characteristics (adjusted hazard r
atio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.55). Patients with an acut
e MI and a PCE who were treated with thrombolysis (n=29 [25%]) were co
mpared with 46 patients found ineligible for thrombolysis primarily be
cause of their PCE. The timing of the PCE was com parable in both grou
ps (one fifth in the preceding year), while prior transient ischemic a
ttacks were more prevalent among patients who had undergone thrombolys
is. The patients who were treated with thrombolysis (n=29) were older,
had a higher rate of anterior infarction, and, while in the hospital,
received aspirin, anticoagulants, and P-blockers more often than thei
r counterparts (n=46). In-hospital intracranial hemorrhage did not occ
ur in either group. The 1-year mortality rates were 2-fold higher amon
g patients who had not undergone thrombolysis compared with those who
had (33% vs 18%; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.44; 95% confidence interval,
0.78-7.64). Conclusions: These findings, derived from 2 nationwide su
rveys of consecutive patients with acute MI, suggest that patients wit
h PCEs have an adverse outcome attributed to their older age and less
favorable risk profile. Thrombolytic therapy, however, based on our pr
eliminary data, may be beneficial in selected patients with an acute M
I with a nonrecent PCE.