M. Roux, CLASSIFICATION AND ONTOGENY IN CRINOIDEA - NECESSITY OF A REVISION OFCHARACTERS HIERARCHY, Bulletin de la Societe zoologique de France, 122(4), 1997, pp. 371-378
Crinoidea classification poses problems for which satisfactory solutio
ns have yet to be found. The distinction between three paleozoic subcl
asses (Inadunata, Camerata, Flexibilia) and one post-paleozoic subclas
s (Articulata) remains largely artificial. As each recent stalked taxo
n was discovered, it was arbitrary attributed to the subclass Articula
ta. Efficient keys for the distinction of homologies and convergences
are still to be discovered. New answers might be found through a reapp
raisal of the skeletal homologies in Echinoderms recently proposed by
B. DAVID and R. MOOI (1994 and 1996).