DIRECTIONS OF MOTION FIELDS ARE HARDLY EVER AMBIGUOUS

Citation
T. Brodsky et al., DIRECTIONS OF MOTION FIELDS ARE HARDLY EVER AMBIGUOUS, International journal of computer vision, 26(1), 1998, pp. 5-24
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Computer Science Artificial Intelligence","Computer Science Artificial Intelligence
ISSN journal
09205691
Volume
26
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
5 - 24
Database
ISI
SICI code
0920-5691(1998)26:1<5:DOMFAH>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
If instead of the full motion field, we consider only the direction of the motion field due to a rigid motion, what can we say about the thr ee-dimensional motion information contained in it? This paper provides a geometric analysis of this question based solely on the constraint that the depth of the surfaces in view is positive. The motivation beh ind this analysis is to provide a theoretical foundation for image con straints employing only the sign of flow in various directions and jus tify their utilization for addressing 3D dynamic vision problems. It i s shown that, considering as the imaging surface the whole sphere, ind ependently of the scene in view, two different rigid motions cannot gi ve rise to the same directional motion field. If we restrict the image to half of a sphere (or an infinitely large image plane) two differen t rigid motions with instantaneous translational and rotational veloci ties (t(1), omega(1)) and (t(2), omega(2)) cannot give rise to the sam e directional motion field unless the plane through t(1) and t(2) is p erpendicular to the plane through omega(1) and omega(2) (i.e., (t(1) x t(2)) . (omega(1) x omega(2)) = 0). In addition, in order to give pra ctical significance to these uniqueness results for the case of a limi ted field of view, we also characterize the locations on the image whe re the motion vectors due to the different motions must have different directions. If (omega(1) x omega(2)) . (t(1) x t(2)) = 0 and certain additional constraints are met, then the two rigid motions could produ ce motion fields with the same direction. For this to happen the depth of each corresponding surface has to be within a certain range, defin ed by a second and a third order surface. Similar more restrictive con straints are obtained for the case of multiple motions. Consequently, directions of motion fields are hardly ever ambiguous. A byproduct of the analysis is that full motion fields are never ambiguous with a hal f sphere as the imaging surface.