Exhalation and inhalation valves from half-facepiece negative pressure
respirators were evaluated for leakage during an 8-hour cyclic breath
ing test period using two work rates (415 and 622 kg-m/min) and two pa
rticle sizes (0.3 and 0.8 mu m). Three different models (manufacturers
) of exhalation valves were tested, with two lots for each model. Exha
lation valve leakage ranged from 0.0 to 0.03%; no failure of exhalatio
n valves occurred. No differences in lot or manufacturer were found. D
ifferences in particle size did not lead to differences in penetration
at the lower work rate; at the higher work rate 0.3-mu m particles we
re less penetrating than 0.8-mu m particles (0.03 versus 0.06%). When
tested for air leakage at a pressure of 2.54 cm H2O, following the Nat
ional Institute for Occupational Safety and Health certification metho
d, exhalation valves exhibited no leakage either before or after the e
xperiments. Inhalation valves averaged 20% leakage for all experiments
; 0.3-mu m particles were again less penetrating (13%) than 0.8-mu m p
articles (27%). No inhalation valve failure occurred. No differences i
n lot (within manufacturer) were found; there were, however, significa
nt differences in particle penetration among the three manufacturers'
inhalation valves. Airflow leakage through the inhalation valves did n
ot change during the experimental period, but differed among the three
manufacturers. Measurements using airflow leakage and particle penetr
ation produced the same ranking for the th ree manufacturers' in halat
ion valves.