Clinical studies are usually conceived of as controlled randomized tri
als, as retrospective patient statistics or as single case reports. Ho
wever, such a classification is too narrow and overlooks many other fo
rms of study designs. This review,therefore, offers a more encompassin
g and practical classification of clinical studies for the field of em
ergency medicine. Randomized controlled trials fulfill scientific crit
eria at the highest level (gold standard): comparison, repeatability,
objective measurement. At the same time, randomized trials also have t
o comply with demanding ethical criteria and must be justifiable in th
e individual patient. Therefore, comparable uncertainty with regard to
the superiority of the treatment options under investigation is a sin
e qua non. In addition to randomized trials, six other groups of clini
cal trials have the potential to solve scientific questions in emergen
cy medicine: observational studies, decision analysis, meta analysis,
public health care studies, case reports and descriptive summary stati
stics and studies on ethical problems. This variability in trial desig
ns calls for a clinically oriented methodologist; the concept and inst
itutionalization of theoretical surgery has been a response to this de
mand. All study types in this review are illustrated by examples in em
ergency medicine. Literature for advanced reading in particular trial
methodologies can be found in the reference list. A checklist summariz
es all elements for designing and conducting randomized trials in emer
gency medicine. All clinical trials striving for a high standard of qu
ality whether randomized or not - depend on the following prerequisite
s: professional organization,time effort, a supportive social environm
ent and a scientific culture.