R. Love et al., POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE DECREASES MESENTERIC BLOOD-FLOW DESPITE NORMALIZATION OF CARDIAC-OUTPUT, The journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 39(2), 1995, pp. 195-199
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a commonly used adjunct to
mechanical ventilation and is known to have deleterious effects on car
diac output (CO). Its effects on regional blood flow are not well know
n. We evaluated the effect of PEEP on the mesenteric microcirculation
and CO. Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with mechanical ventilation a
nd either no PEEP (Control) or increasing levels of PEEP (PEEP). Using
in vivo video-microscopy, mesenteric Al arteriolar optical Doppler ve
locities and Al and A3 (the first- and third-order arterioles branchin
g off the feeding mesenteric arcade) intraluminal diameters were measu
red (n = 6/group). In a separate set of experimental animals, CO was d
etermined by thermodilution technique (n = 5/group). Additionally, aft
er the PEEP group attained a PEEP level of 20-cm H2O PEEP, two boluses
of 2 mt 0.9 normal saline (NS) were given intravenously. The Control
groups had the same determinations performed over the same time course
as the PEEP group but were not exposed to any PEEP. Mesenteric blood
flow (MBF) was calculated from vessel diameter and red blood cell velo
city. The MBF and CO fell progressively as PEEP was increased from 10-
to 15- to 20-cm H2O pressure. MBF was reduced 75% (p < 0.05) and the
CO was reduced 31% (p < 0.05) from baseline at 20-cm H2O pressure PEEP
. After 4 mt normal saline, the MBF was still 45% below baseline (p <
0.05) while the CO had returned to baseline. In conclusion, both MBF a
nd CO are decreased significantly with increasing PEEP. Fluid resuscit
ation will reverse the adverse effects of PEEP on CO, but there is onl
y partial correction of the negative effects on MBF.