EXPERTISE AND RADIOLOGICAL-DIAGNOSIS - II - EMPIRICAL-STUDY

Citation
E. Raufaste et al., EXPERTISE AND RADIOLOGICAL-DIAGNOSIS - II - EMPIRICAL-STUDY, Journal de radiologie, 79(3), 1998, pp. 235-240
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
02210363
Volume
79
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
235 - 240
Database
ISI
SICI code
0221-0363(1998)79:3<235:EAR-I->2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
In order to study cognitive processes of radiological diagnosis, 22 ra diologists with different experience levels interpreted two complex fi lms, with no clinical data. Exploration strategies, used knowledge and reasoning were analyzed. Experimented radiologists interpreted clues more easily, using richer and more integrated knowledge. They used a s ymptomatic exploration, guided by hypotheses that related to salient c ues. Cues that were both subtle and unexpected were better detected by novices and ''super experts'' than by intermediates and ''basic exper ts''. Novices detected those cues by mean of a systematic exploration. ''Super experts'' benefitted from an increased likelihood of unexpect ed cue detection due to longer and more supported reasoning. Also, the y might have complemented the symptomatic exploration with an automati c systematic one.