TERRORISM, POLITICS, AND PUNISHMENT - A TEST OF STRUCTURAL-CONTEXTUALTHEORY AND THE LIBERATION HYPOTHESIS

Citation
Bl. Smith et Kr. Damphousse, TERRORISM, POLITICS, AND PUNISHMENT - A TEST OF STRUCTURAL-CONTEXTUALTHEORY AND THE LIBERATION HYPOTHESIS, Criminology, 36(1), 1998, pp. 67-92
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Criminology & Penology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00111384
Volume
36
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
67 - 92
Database
ISI
SICI code
0011-1384(1998)36:1<67:TPAP-A>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
The sentencing literature generally has been characterized by an inabi lity to explain significant amounts of the variance in sentencing outc omes. Two major theoretical explanations have addressed this issue: st ructural-contextual theory and the ''liberation hypothesis.'' Structur al-contextual theory suggests that the components of the justice syste m traditionally work somewhat independently of one another. This theor y suggests that variance explained in sentence outcomes will increase appreciably when components function with greater interdependence-a so -called ''tightening'' or ''coupling'' effect. Such tightening suppose dly takes place when particular cases are given high priority for inve stigation and prosecution. An example of this situation might be domes tic terrorism. The liberation hypothesis suggests that the greater the severity of an offense, the less likely judges or juries will feel fr ee to follow their own sentiments regarding guilt and punishment. As a consequence, the ability of legal variables to predict variation in s entence length will be greater as crime severity increases. This study compares a sample of officially designated terrorists matched with no nterrorists convicted of the same federal offenses. OLS regression and structural equation modeling procedures are used to compare the level s of explained variance for the two groups. The results indicate stron g support for the basic premises of both theories. Explained variance for the terrorist sample is more than four times greater than the expl ained variance for the nonterrorist sample. Further analysis shows tha t explained variance is highest for terrorists who have committed a hi gh-severity offense and lowest for nonterrorists who have committed a low-severity offense. The subsequent addition of other predictor varia bles available only for the terrorist sample further increases the exp lained variance and provides additional support for the liberation hyp othesis.