DIAGNOSTIC OF LIVER-TUMORS - WHEN ARE RAD IONUCLIDE METHODS OF IMPORTANCE

Citation
Kf. Gratz et A. Weimann, DIAGNOSTIC OF LIVER-TUMORS - WHEN ARE RAD IONUCLIDE METHODS OF IMPORTANCE, Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie, 123(2), 1998, pp. 111-118
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
ISSN journal
0044409X
Volume
123
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
111 - 118
Database
ISI
SICI code
0044-409X(1998)123:2<111:DOL-WA>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
This paper illustrates the importance of utilizing radionuclide techni ques to characterize in vivo benign liver masses. Examining the physio logic tumor function cholescintigraphy offers a highly specific patter n for identifying focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH): hypervascularisatio n, hepatocellular uptake and impaired transport of the bilirubin like tracer documented as trapping in later images. An hemangioma is diagno sed with high probability in case of a positive bloodpoolscintigraphy. But false-positve results have been reported. Therefore, a second unr elated examination, e. g. ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging or dy namic computerized tomography is neccessary to establish this diagnose in a sufficient certainity. If complications due to tumor growth are not expected, both, FNH and hemangioma need no further therapy. High s ensitivity is neccessary to establish resectability or tumor spread. S cintigraphic techniques are advantageous in scanning completly the who le body. On the other hand, there are limitations as low resolution an d anatomical orientation, low specific activity in the tumor and artif icial activity near by the tumor. To measure therapy effects and to de tect recurrencies especially in borderline-cases positron emission com puted tomography (PET)-technology is recomended, because PET offers a specific-parametric evaluation.