THE EFFECTS OF STRYCHNINE, BICUCULLINE, AND KETAMINE ON IMMERSION-INHIBITED DORSAL HORN CONVERGENT NEURONS IN INTACT AND SPINALIZED RATS

Citation
S. Mcgaraughty et Jl. Henry, THE EFFECTS OF STRYCHNINE, BICUCULLINE, AND KETAMINE ON IMMERSION-INHIBITED DORSAL HORN CONVERGENT NEURONS IN INTACT AND SPINALIZED RATS, Brain research, 784(1-2), 1998, pp. 63-70
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
00068993
Volume
784
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
63 - 70
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-8993(1998)784:1-2<63:TEOSBA>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
In both intact and spinalized rats, this study examined the effects of strychnine (a glycine antagonist), bicuculline (a GABA, antagonist), and ketamine (a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist) on one parti cular class of lumbar dorsal horn convergent neurons. This group of co nvergent neurons are inhibited when a rat's entire ipsilateral hindpaw is immersed in 50 degrees C water. A strong neuronal afterdischarge f ollows as soon as the paw is removed from the water. Strychnine (2 mg/ kg, iv) increased ongoing activity and blocked the 'inhibition phase' in both intact and spinalized rats demonstrating that a spinal-related glycine mechanism was involved in the inhibition. However, only in in tact rats did the firing rate of the 'afterdischarge phase' increase s ignificantly from pre-drug levels, suggesting that supraspinal sites m ay be involved in modulating this phase. Ketamine (15 mg/kg, iv) depre ssed ongoing activity and the firing rate during the afterdischarge ph ase of these neurons. Additionally, ketamine reversed the strychnine-i nduced increase in ongoing activity. Bicuculline (2 mg/kg, iv) had no effect on the activity of this cell class. As shown previously, and re plicated here, these 'immersion-inhibited' neurons invariably have bot h inhibitory and excitatory mechano-receptive fields on the ipsilatera l hindpaw. Thus, the response of this class of convergent neurons to n oxious stimulation may be a function of relative inputs of glycine and EAA's,each triggered by the stimulation of different receptive fields /regions on the same paw. Furthermore, when both fields are co-stimula ted during noxious immersion of the entire paw, glycine has a stronger influence on activity than does the EAA's. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.