Rk. Simons et al., A RISK ANALYSIS OF STRESS ULCERATION AFTER TRAUMA, The journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 39(2), 1995, pp. 289-294
Prophylaxis for stress ulceration is considered standard care for most
critically ill patients, but may be overutilized, We determined the i
ncidence of stress ulceration in 33,637 major trauma patients treated
in a regionalized trauma system from 1985 to 1991 using trauma registr
y data and chart review, Injury-related risk factors for stress ulcera
tion and other associated infectious and organ failure complications w
ere identified by regression analysis, Clinical stress ulceration deve
loped in 57 patients (0.17%) despite prophylaxis, Eighteen patients (0
,05%) developed severe ulceration with either gastroduodenal perforati
on (3 patients) or a > 2 U blood transfusion requirement (16 patients)
, Independent risk factors with odds ratios (OR) were identified as fo
llows: Injury Severity Score (ISS) greater than or equal to 16, OR = 1
2.6; spinal cord injury, OR = 2.0; and age > 55, OR = 2.4, Other serio
us complications, including pneumonia, sepsis, and organ failure (adul
t respiratory distress syndrome and renal and hepatic failure), were s
ignificantly associated with the development of stress ulceration, Cli
nically significant stress ulceration after trauma is uncommon, but oc
curs despite prophylaxis, Severe injury (ISS > 16) and spinal cord inj
ury were identified as independent injury-related risk factors, All pa
tients with severe ulceration had either one of these injury-related r
isk factors or a significant infectious complication or organ failure,
Standard prophylaxis may be inadequate in high-risk patients, who sho
uld be targeted for increased surveillance and aggressive prophylaxis.
On the other hand, routine prophylaxis in low-risk patients may be ov
erutilized.