COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND QUALITY-OF-LIFE ASSESSMENT OF GM-CSF AS AN ADJUNCT TO INTENSIVE REMISSION INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY IN ELDERLY PATIENTSWITH ACUTE MYELOID-LEUKEMIA
Ca. Uyldegroot et al., COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND QUALITY-OF-LIFE ASSESSMENT OF GM-CSF AS AN ADJUNCT TO INTENSIVE REMISSION INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY IN ELDERLY PATIENTSWITH ACUTE MYELOID-LEUKEMIA, British Journal of Haematology, 100(4), 1998, pp. 629-636
We conducted a prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial com
paring the effects and costs of GM-CSF as an adjunct to intensive chem
otherapy in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). The p
atients were randomized to either daunomycin-cytosine arabinoside (con
trol arm: rr = 161) or daunomycin-cytosine arabinoside with GM-CSF (GM
-CSF arm: n = 157). The primary end-point was the effect of GM-CSF on
the percentage of complete remissions (CR), Survival duration, disease
-free survival, quality of life and costs were evaluated separately, C
R after remission induction treatment was achieved in 55% of the patie
nts in the control group and in 56% of the patients in the GM-CSF grou
p (P = NS), The duration of survival and disease-free survival at 2 ye
ars after randomization were estimated at 22% and 19% for the control
group and 22% and 14% for the GM-CSF group (P = NS). Considering the s
hort-term quality of life, the administration of GM-CSF resulted in mo
re problems with regard to depressed mood, diarrhoea and rash/eczema.
With regard to the longterm quality of life there were no significant
differences between the two groups, The average costs of the primary t
reatment were higher in GM-CSF-treated patients than in the control gr
oup, i.e. US$40782 and US$34465, respectively (P < 0.01). The costs du
ring the follow-up period did not differ between the two groups. The r
esults of this randomized clinical trial indicate that daunomycin-cyto
sine arabinoside plus GM-CSF is not a cost-effective treatment strateg
y when compared with daunomycin-cytosine arabinoside alone.