IMPACT OF A CHILD FIRST-AID WALL CALENDAR ON LAY PEOPLES SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE OF INFANT CPR

Citation
K. Sunde et al., IMPACT OF A CHILD FIRST-AID WALL CALENDAR ON LAY PEOPLES SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE OF INFANT CPR, Resuscitation, 36(1), 1998, pp. 59-64
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
Journal title
ISSN journal
03009572
Volume
36
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
59 - 64
Database
ISI
SICI code
0300-9572(1998)36:1<59:IOACFW>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate whether mass-mailing of a 12-mont h wall calendar which focused on child and infant safety and first aid treatment had any educational effect on lay people. The calendar incl uded algorithms for removal of a foreign body from the airways and inf ant and child CPR. The knowledge and skills in these procedures were t ested in two groups using a previously validated check-list before and after the introduction of the calendar. One group received the calend ar by mass mailing, free-of-charge. Six months after calendar distribu tion the mean result for 52 persons tested was 18% correct, not differ ent from the 19% correct for 65 persons tested before calendar distrib ution. The other group received the calendar as part of an internal co mpany campaign focusing on infant and child safety with a possibility for borrowing a baby manikin, but with no instruction involved. In thi s group the mean result improved significantly from 27% precalendar (n = 57) to 47% (n = 125) (P < 0.001) 1 week after calendar distribution with a significant reduction to 38% (n = 52) (P = 0.004) 6 months lat er, still significantly better than precalendar (P = 0.004). Test pers ons younger than 50 years old scored better than those older than 50 y ears (39 vs. 22%, P < 0.001), and the test persons scored better if th ey had been tested previously (44 vs. 35%, P = 0.04) or had practised with a baby manikin (45 vs. 35%, P = 0.02). Whether the test persons h ad children 0-8 years old or not, did not affect the results. In concl usion the calendar had no educational effect when distributed by mail, but a safety campaign which included distribution of the calendar and a possibility to borrow a manikin had a positive influence on the fir st aid skills and knowledge of lay people. Mass mailing of CPR or othe r first aid material free-of-charge does not seem to further the goal of increasing the rate and proficiency of bystander interventions to s ave lives. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.