Kr. Bull et Ma. Sutton, CRITICAL LOADS AND THE RELEVANCE OF AMMONIA TO AN EFFECTS-BASED NITROGEN PROTOCOL, Atmospheric environment, 32(3), 1998, pp. 565-572
With the signing of the Second Sulphur Protocol in Oslo in 1994, many
countries indicated their willingness to adopt an effects-based approa
ch to reducing pollutant emissions. Current activities under the UNECE
Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution have now moved t
o revision of the NOx Protocol. Because of the complex interaction of
NOx with other pollutants, a ''multi-pollutant, multi-effect'' approac
h is envisaged, taking into account emissions of total reactive N (as
NOx and NH3), and considering acidification, nutrient N and photochemi
cal oxidant effects. The magnitude of NH3 emissions and deposition of
NHx at an international scale have necessitated that NH3 be considered
. Adoption of an effects-based approach for NH3 demands much informati
on regarding the quantification of emissions and deposition, the under
standing of physicochemical and biological processes for estimating cr
itical loads, and the assessment of effectiveness and costs of emissio
n abatement measures. In addition, methodology is needed to enable aba
tement strategies to be developed for SO2, NOx and NH3 at the same tim
e. For the Second S Protocol, an approach defining the ''S friction''
(S-f) of acidity critical loads was used to distinguish S and N effect
s. Besides being difficult to justify scientifically, the dependence o
f S-f on ''current'' deposition results in changing critical loads as
deposition is reduced. Current work under the Convention uses a ''crit
ical loads function'', which considers S and N deposition simultaneous
ly, for both acidification and eutrophication. This approach, together
with the integrated assessment models approach used for the S Protoco
l, is achieving some of the multi-pollutant goals, though because of t
he link of emissions to environmental impacts, ongoing scientific unde
rpinning and improved data remain essential. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science
Ltd. All rights reserved.