A COMPARISON OF REGULAR SALMETEROL VS AS REQUIRED SALBUTAMOL THERAPY IN ASTHMATIC-CHILDREN

Citation
A. Vonberg et al., A COMPARISON OF REGULAR SALMETEROL VS AS REQUIRED SALBUTAMOL THERAPY IN ASTHMATIC-CHILDREN, Respiratory medicine, 92(2), 1998, pp. 292-299
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Respiratory System
Journal title
ISSN journal
09546111
Volume
92
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
292 - 299
Database
ISI
SICI code
0954-6111(1998)92:2<292:ACORSV>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
In a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel study, 426 asthma tic children aged 5-15 years old received salmeterol 50 mu g b.i.d, or placebo b.i.d, via the Diskhaler(TM). All patients had access to inha led salbutamol to be used on an 'as required' (p.r.n.) basis for sympt omatic relief. The study design comprised a 2-week baseline, a 12-mont h treatment period incorporating 2-week 'off treatment' after 6 months , and a 2-week follow-up period at the end of the trial. At the end of 12 months of treatment with salmeterol, the adjusted change from base line for morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PER was 56 and 471 min(-1), respectively, and this was significantly greater than pl acebo (P<0.01; P<0.05). Exacerbation rates did not differ between grou ps and results were not dependent upon concurrent inhaled steroid use, Neither treatment caused a change of 21 doubling dose in PC20/PD20 ei ther during or on stopping treatment. Treatment with regular salmetero l 50 mu g b.i.d. over a 12-month treatment period provides a significa nt, rapid and will-maintained improvement in lung function without inc reasing bronchial reactivity or asthma exacerbation rates compared to p.r.n. salbutamol.