J. Vandesteene et al., ELECTRONIC PORTAL IMAGING WITH ONLINE CORRECTION OF SETUP ERROR IN THORACIC IRRADIATION - CLINICAL-EVALUATION, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 40(4), 1998, pp. 967-976
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: To analyze setup errors and the feasibility of their on-line
correction using electronic portal imaging in the irradiation of lung
tumors. Methods and Materials: Sixteen patients with lung cancer were
irradiated through opposed anteroposterior fields. Localization images
of anteroposterior fields were recorded with an electronic portal ima
ging device (EPID). Using an in-house developed algorithm for on-line
comparison of portal images setup errors were measured and a correctio
n of table position was performed with a remote couch control prior to
treatment. In addition, residual errors were measured on the EPID ver
ification image. Global and individual mean and standard deviation of
setup errors were calculated and compared. The feasibility of the proc
edure was assessed measuring intra-and interobserver variability, infl
uence of organ movement, reproducibility of error measurement, the ext
ra time fraction needed for measuring and adjusting and the fraction o
f dose needed for imaging.Results: In two setups the procedure could n
ot be finished normally due to problems inherent to the procedure. The
reproducibility, intraobserver variability, and influence of organ mo
vements were each described by a distribution with a mean value less t
han or equal to 1 mm and a standard deviation (SD) of less than 1.5 mm
. The interobserver variability showed to be a little bit larger (mean
: 0.3 mm, SD: 1.7 mm). The mean time to perform the irradiation of the
anteroposterior field was 4 +/- 1 min. The mean time for the measurem
ent and correction procedure approximated 2.5 min. The mean extra time
fraction was 65 +/- 24% (1 SD) with more than half of this coming fro
m the error measurement. The dose needed for generation of EPID images
was 5.9 +/- 1.4% of total treatment dose. The mean and SD of setup er
rors were, respectively, 0.1 and 4.5 mm for longitudinal and -2.0 and
5.7 mm for transversal errors. Of 196 measured translational errors 12
0 (61%) exceeded the adjustment criteria. For individual patients syst
ematic and random setup errors can be as high as, respectively, 15.8 a
nd 7.5 mm. Mean residual error and SD were for longitudinal direction
0.08 and 1.2 mm and for transversal direction -0.9 and 1.0 mm (pooled
data). For individuals, the mean residual errors were smaller than 1 m
m, with a typical SD per patient of less than 2 mm. Conclusion: Setup
errors in thoracic radiation therapy are clinically important. On-line
correction can be performed accurately with an objective measurement
tool, although this prolongs the irradiation procedure for one field w
ith 65%. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.