Ee. Klein et al., MULTIPLE MACHINE IMPLEMENTATION OF ENHANCED DYNAMIC WEDGE, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 40(4), 1998, pp. 977-985
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: After acquiring 4 years of experience with Dynamic Wedge, a s
oftware-driven one-dimensional (1D) compensation system, we implemente
d a new software version called Enhanced Dynamic Wedge (EDW), The EDW
allows larger (30 cm) and asymmetric field sizes and additional angles
for wedged fields, We implemented this software on four similar dual-
energy accelerators that also possess upper and lower physical wedge s
ets, Our goal was to implement EDW with one common wedge factor (WF) t
able and one set of treatment-planning files. Methods and Materials: W
e measured WFs with an ionization chamber and isodose profiles with bo
th film and a diode array. We used a calculation scheme that requires
only entry of the wedge angle and fixed jaw value, Filters for compute
rized treatment planning were configured for each wedge angle, We also
examined to what degree the multileaf collimation (MLC) orientation,
which is orthogonal to the EDW direction, was compromised for specific
treatment sites, As a comparative test, we examined the dosimetric co
nsistency for the 8 sets of physical wedges on the four machines, Fina
lly, we updated our DW quality assurance program for EDW. Results: The
measured EDW WF was common for all four machines to within +/- 1.5% a
nd the calculation scheme held to within 1.5%. The EDW isodoses were c
onsistent among the machines as measured by film and diode array, The
treatment-planning filters provided computed isodose profiles that wer
e nearly identical to measured profiles, Regarding MLC orientation, we
found that the collimator angle needed for EDW did not compromise iso
dose distributions, as apparent in measured isodoses and calculated do
se-volume histograms, The consistency of the physical wedges did not f
are as well, Two of the lower wedge sets had Wfs and profiles differen
t (>3%) from the other wedge sets. Conclusions: We have successfully i
mplemented EDW on four machines using only one WF table and one set of
treatment-planning filters, The EDW provides for improved treatment t
echniques for particular sites due to the large field sizes and additi
onal angles available, Daily treatment efficiency has increased becaus
e of the remote capability provided by EDW. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science
Inc.