MICROSURGICAL TUBAL ANASTOMOSES PERFORMED AS AN OUTPATIENT PROCEDURE BY MINILAPAROTOMY ARE LESS EXPENSIVE AND AS SAFE AS THOSE PERFORMED ASAN INPATIENT PROCEDURE
Mj. Slowey et Cc. Coddington, MICROSURGICAL TUBAL ANASTOMOSES PERFORMED AS AN OUTPATIENT PROCEDURE BY MINILAPAROTOMY ARE LESS EXPENSIVE AND AS SAFE AS THOSE PERFORMED ASAN INPATIENT PROCEDURE, Fertility and sterility, 69(3), 1998, pp. 492-495
Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness, safety, and success of
microsurgical tubal anastomoses performed by minilaparotomy as an out
patient. Design: Retrospective. Setting: Military tertiary care medica
l center. Patient(s): Seventy consecutively seen a omen of reproductiv
e age who were undergoing surgical reversal of sterilization from Augu
st 1, 1993, through August 1, 1995. Intervention(s): Microsurgical ste
rilization reversal by minilaparotomy was performed as an inpatient (g
roup 1, 47 patients) or as an outpatient (group 2, 23 patients), Main
Outcome Measure(s): Cost, complication rate, pregnancy rate. Result(s)
: The procedure cost more for inpatients ($3,116) than for outpatients
($1,456). Pregnancy rates were similar (56% in group 1 vs. 75% in gro
up 2). There was only one complication in the series. Conclusion(s): O
utpatient microsurgical sterilization reversal performed by minilaparo
tomy is as safe and effective as the inpatient procedure and is less e
xpensive. (C) 1998 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.