MICROSURGICAL TUBAL ANASTOMOSES PERFORMED AS AN OUTPATIENT PROCEDURE BY MINILAPAROTOMY ARE LESS EXPENSIVE AND AS SAFE AS THOSE PERFORMED ASAN INPATIENT PROCEDURE

Citation
Mj. Slowey et Cc. Coddington, MICROSURGICAL TUBAL ANASTOMOSES PERFORMED AS AN OUTPATIENT PROCEDURE BY MINILAPAROTOMY ARE LESS EXPENSIVE AND AS SAFE AS THOSE PERFORMED ASAN INPATIENT PROCEDURE, Fertility and sterility, 69(3), 1998, pp. 492-495
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00150282
Volume
69
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
492 - 495
Database
ISI
SICI code
0015-0282(1998)69:3<492:MTAPAA>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness, safety, and success of microsurgical tubal anastomoses performed by minilaparotomy as an out patient. Design: Retrospective. Setting: Military tertiary care medica l center. Patient(s): Seventy consecutively seen a omen of reproductiv e age who were undergoing surgical reversal of sterilization from Augu st 1, 1993, through August 1, 1995. Intervention(s): Microsurgical ste rilization reversal by minilaparotomy was performed as an inpatient (g roup 1, 47 patients) or as an outpatient (group 2, 23 patients), Main Outcome Measure(s): Cost, complication rate, pregnancy rate. Result(s) : The procedure cost more for inpatients ($3,116) than for outpatients ($1,456). Pregnancy rates were similar (56% in group 1 vs. 75% in gro up 2). There was only one complication in the series. Conclusion(s): O utpatient microsurgical sterilization reversal performed by minilaparo tomy is as safe and effective as the inpatient procedure and is less e xpensive. (C) 1998 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.