Z. Debyser et al., FAILURE TO QUANTIFY VIRAL LOAD WITH 2 OF THE 3 COMMERCIAL METHODS IN A PREGNANT WOMAN HARBORING AN HIV TYPE-1 SUBTYPE-G STRAIN, AIDS research and human retroviruses, 14(5), 1998, pp. 453-459
The level of HIV-1 RNA in plasma has become one of the most important
markers in the follow-up of HIV-infected patients, Three techniques ar
e commercially available: both the Amplicor HIV Monitor and the NASBA
HIV-1 RNA QT are target amplification methods, whereas the Quantiplex
HIV RNA assay is a branched DNA signal amplification technique, Detect
ion in both target amplification techniques is based on a single prime
r pair and a single probe in the gag region, whereas multiple probes c
apture the pal region of the viral RNA in the branched DNA assay, We i
nvestigated the discrepant observation of an undetectable viral load i
n an immunodeficient pregnant HIV-l-infected patient of African origin
with no prior antiretroviral treatment, Although clinical progression
was present in this patient with tuberculosis and a low CD4 cell coun
t, viral load determinations with both the Amplicor Monitor and NASBA
assays revealed no detectable RNA levels, The presence of HIV-1 RNA in
the plasma of the patient was demonstrated by an in-house RNA-PCR, Su
bsequent HIV-1 RNA quantification with the branched DNA method reveale
d a high viremia (460,000 copies/ml), DNA sequence analysis of the gag
gene identified a subtype G HIV-1 strain (HIV-1(BL)). To our knowledg
e this is the first report of a patient harboring an HIV-1 genotype of
the main group with a high viral load as quantified by the branched D
NA assay, but undetectable with the two commercial HIV RNA amplificati
on techniques because of genetic divergence. In the case of discrepant
low viral loads determined by one amplification technique in patients
with advanced clinical stage one should use an alternative quantifica
tion technique for confirmation.