THE DETERMINATION OF ALGAL BIOMASS (AS CHLOROPHYLL) IN SUSPENDED MATTER FROM THE ELBE ESTUARY AND THE GERMAN BIGHT - A COMPARISON OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY, DELAYED FLUORESCENCE AND PROMPT FLUORESCENCE METHODS
Kh. Wiltshire et al., THE DETERMINATION OF ALGAL BIOMASS (AS CHLOROPHYLL) IN SUSPENDED MATTER FROM THE ELBE ESTUARY AND THE GERMAN BIGHT - A COMPARISON OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY, DELAYED FLUORESCENCE AND PROMPT FLUORESCENCE METHODS, Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology, 222(1-2), 1998, pp. 113-131
HPLC methods are now widely accepted as being the only accurate means
of quantifying chlorophyll in aquatic systems. Very little is known ab
out the comparability of HPLC with conventional in situ prompt fluores
cence methods and with newer techniques involving the measurement of d
elayed fluorescence of phytoplankton (measure of living algal biomass)
in aquatic systems. This paper investigates the use of HPLC for the c
alibration of in situ delayed fluorometric and Turner fluorometric met
hods and the correlation of these methods to one another when applied
to chlorophyll measurements in waters from the Elbe estuary and the Ge
rman Bight. The data shows that the correlations of HPLC to both metho
ds were high r(2) = 0.7-0.99 when all the samples taken were from the
reaches of the river Elbe (605-725 km). The correlations of all method
s were low at r(2) = 0.45-0.52 for samples taken in the saline part of
the Elbe plume and when the chlorophyll concentrations were low (0.2-
9 mu g.l(-1) ) and with comparatively high chlorophyllide and chloroph
yll c contents. Generally the correlations of HPLC to delayed fluoresc
ence were better than the other correlations. This was probably due to
the fact that delayed fluorescence measurements are not affected by t
he presence of other chlorophylls and their breakdown products whereas
prompt fluorescence signals are. Delayed and prompt fluorescence meth
ods can be calibrated accurately against HPLC values for chlorophyll i
n the natural samples and correlations remained good over several days
. However, we suggest that it is advisable to check these as often as
possible, particularly in the face of measurable changes of turbidity,
salinity or spectral properties of the water. In this work the May an
d October slopes for the comparisons HPLC: delayed fluorescence in the
limnic Elbe below Hamburg were similar (i.e. 223-245). A significantl
y lower slope (160) was found for the 32 stations in the Elbe mouth/Ge
rman Bight, This indicates that we were dealing with different water b
odies and thus different algal populations and is backed up by the HPL
C fingerprints of the samples. Our work shows conclusively that althou
gh a correlation may be good between absolute chromatographic methods
and fluorometric/photometric methods, one cannot extrapolate a long-te
rm conversion factor which holds for different sampling times or sites
in any one system, not to mention between systems. (C) 1998 Elsevier
Science B.V.