COMPLEXES OF THE POTENTIALLY HEXADENTATE LIGAND BIS(3-[6-(2,2'-BIPYRIDYL)]PYRAZOL-1-YL)HYDROBORATE WITH REPRESENTATIVE S-BLOCK, P-BLOCK, D-BLOCK AND F-BLOCK METAL-IONS - FACTORS PROMOTING FORMATION OF MONONUCLEAR OR DOUBLE-HELICAL DINUCLEAR COMPLEXES
Js. Fleming et al., COMPLEXES OF THE POTENTIALLY HEXADENTATE LIGAND BIS(3-[6-(2,2'-BIPYRIDYL)]PYRAZOL-1-YL)HYDROBORATE WITH REPRESENTATIVE S-BLOCK, P-BLOCK, D-BLOCK AND F-BLOCK METAL-IONS - FACTORS PROMOTING FORMATION OF MONONUCLEAR OR DOUBLE-HELICAL DINUCLEAR COMPLEXES, Journal of the Chemical Society. Dalton transactions, (4), 1998, pp. 537-543
Complexes of the new potentially hexadentate ligand bis{3-[6-(2,2'-bip
yridyl)]pyrazol-1-yl}hydroborate (L-), containing two terdentate chela
ting arms linked by a -BH2-spacer, were prepared and crystallographica
lly characterised with K+, Cu2+, Gd3+ and Tl+ as representatives of th
e s-, d-, f- and p-block metals respectively. The crystal structure of
the K+ complex revealed it to be the double-helical dinuclear [K2L2],
in which each metal ion is six-co-ordinated by a terdentate arm from
each of the two ligands; the two ligands are therefore bridging, and f
olded at the flexible-BH2-spacer group. The complex [Cu2L2[BF4](2) has
a similar double-helical dinuclear cation with six-co-ordinate metal
centres, but with a greater metal-metal separation because of the grea
ter electrostatic repulsion between two dipositive metal ions compared
to [K2L2]. The complex [GdL(NO3)(2)] in contrast is mononuclear with
the ligand co-ordinated in a pseudo-equatorial manner, having a shallo
w helical twist to avoid steric interference between the terminal pyri
dyl groups. The two pseudo-axial bidentate nitrate ligands complete th
e ten-fold co-ordination. Formation of a (triple) helical complex betw
een Gd3+ and L-, known with other bisterdentate compartmental ligands,
is thought to be disfavoured in this case because of the electrostati
c repulsion between the two +3 metal centres that would occur given th
e relatively short metal-metal separations imposed by the ligand. In [
TIL] the Tl+ ion, which is comparable in size and identical in charge
to K+, has a preference for lower co-ordination numbers, which is refl
ected in the fact that not all of the ligand binding sites are co-ordi
nated and there are three relatively short M-N interactions and two lo
ng, weak ones.