Substantial policy changes (like market-oriented reforms by populist p
arties and steps towards pence by ''hawks'') are sometimes implemented
by ''unlikely'' parties. To account for such episodes this paper deve
lops a framework in which incumbent politicians have better informatio
n about the state of the world than voters. The incumbent is unable to
credibly transmit all this information since voters are also imperfec
tly informed about his ideology. This paper identifies conditions unde
r which an incumbent party's electoral prospects increase the more aty
pical the policy it proposes. Popular support for a policy, or its ''c
redibility,'' depends on the policy maker-policy pair.