A. Schnuch et al., PATCH TESTING WITH PRESERVATIVES, ANTIMICROBIALS AND INDUSTRIAL BIOCIDES - RESULTS FROM A MULTICENTER STUDY, British journal of dermatology, 138(3), 1998, pp. 467-476
Preservatives are biologically reactive substances, and their allergen
ic potential has been known for a long time. This study examined the r
ole of different preservatives in a large number of patients with susp
ected allergic contact dermatitis. Patch test data and data from the p
atients' history were collected from the 24 departments participating
in the information Network of Departments of Dermatology from 1 Januar
y 1990 to 31 December 1994. Patch test data from 28,349 patients teste
d with preservatives of the standard series (SS), from 11,485 patients
tested additionally with a preservative series (PS), and from 1787 pa
tients tested with an industrial biocide tray (IB) were evaluated. Sen
sitization rates (standardized) of the SS preservatives were all >1%,
with thiomersal rating highest (5.3%), the parabens lowest (1.6%), and
the remainder (chlormethylisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone, form
aldehyde and methyldibromoglutaronitrile/phenoxyethanol (MDBGN/PE)) in
the range of 2%. The most important allergens of the PS were, in wome
n, alkylaminobenzoate (contained in milking fat) (2.5%), MDBGN/PE (2.2
%), benzalkonium chloride (1.8%), chloracetamide (1.4%), diazolidinyl
urea (1.3%), octylgallate (1.2%) and Bronopol(TM) (1.1%). In men rates
differed only with regard to alkylaminobenzoate (0.9%). Patients test
ed with the IB series reacted most often to methylene-bis-thiocyanate
(5%), but with a reaction index of -0.7, many reactions were most prob
ably false positives. A further seven preservatives, mostly formaldehy
de-releasers used in cutting fluids, gave sensitization rates of betwe
en 1% and 3%. Glutaraldehyde, not contained in the series but often te
sted additionally, showed a remarkable increase in sensitization durin
g the study period. Health care personnel were frequently affected. Al
together, this study identified areas of concern within the different
groups of preservatives. The overall impact of most of the preservativ
es on public health seems to be low, but for diagnostic reasons preser
vatives must be included in patch test series.