THE DOUBLE MYTH OF FLEXIBILIZATION - TRENDS IN SCATTERED WORK HOURS, AND DIFFERENCES IN TIME-SOVEREIGNTY

Authors
Citation
K. Breedveld, THE DOUBLE MYTH OF FLEXIBILIZATION - TRENDS IN SCATTERED WORK HOURS, AND DIFFERENCES IN TIME-SOVEREIGNTY, Time & society, 7(1), 1998, pp. 129-143
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Social, Sciences, Interdisciplinary
Journal title
ISSN journal
0961463X
Volume
7
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
129 - 143
Database
ISI
SICI code
0961-463X(1998)7:1<129:TDMOF->2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Advocates of the flexibilization of working time argue that many peopl e are already accustomed to working evenings, nights and weekends, and that flexibilization will improve people's control over time. In this article, these two assertions are put to trial. For this, the author relies on time-budget data that were gathered in The Netherlands betwe en 1975 and 1995. The analyses indicate that even in 1995 most work is still being performed 'from 9 to 5'. As regards time-sovereignty, it appears that control over working time is related more to levels of ed ucation than to working atypical hours.