A. Rudisch et al., METALLIC ARTIFACTS IN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF PATIENTS WITH SPINAL-FUSION - A COMPARISON OF IMPLANT MATERIALS AND IMAGING SEQUENCES, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 23(6), 1998, pp. 692-699
Study Design. Devices for spinal fusion were compared with respect to
their influence on magnetic resonance images. In addition, different m
agnetic resonance pulse sequences were evaluated to elicit their susce
ptibility to imaging artifacts. Objectives. To determine the implants
with the least imaging artifacts as a recommendation for the spine sur
geon and to assess the best imaging strategy for the radiologist. Summ
ary of Background Data. For patients who have had surgical spinal fusi
on with instrumentation, magnetic resonance imaging is the most favora
ble diagnostic method. Unfortunately, metallic implants lead to severe
degradation of image quality. These artifacts depend on the material
of the implant and on the choice of the pulse sequence. Methods. The f
usion devices were mounted on a simple plastic phantom in various comb
inations and were imaged on 1.5-T magnetic resonance units. Frequently
used types of plates and screws made of titanium or steel in various
alloys were examined on the phantom with routinely used pulse sequence
s. The results of these examinations were compared with those in patie
nt studies involving the same implants as well as the same pulse seque
nces. Results. The least imaging artifacts were caused by titanium imp
lants, especially when using shorter screws, wider implants, especiall
y when using shorter screws, wider screw placement, and thinner titani
um plates. Nevertheless, there were distinct image distortions that co
uld lead to erroneous image interpretation. The best images were acqui
red by spin echo (T1), turbo spin echo (T1, T2), and half Fourier sing
le shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) sequences. Sequences containing any gr
adient echo components (gradient echo or turbo gradient and spin echo
sequence or frequency-selective fat saturation techniques) resulted in
the highest amount of image degradation. Conclusion. By choosing appr
opriate spinal fusion devices as well as pulse sequences, postoperativ
e magnetic resonance imaging examinations can give acceptable results,
in spite of the presence of metallic implants.