Cg. Cogger et al., MATCHING PLANT-AVAILABLE NITROGEN FROM BIOSOLIDS WITH DRYLAND WHEAT NEEDS, Journal of production agriculture, 11(1), 1998, pp. 41-47
Biosolids are stabilized solids from municipal wastewater treatment th
at meet federal standards for land application. Good estimates of bios
olids N availability are needed to develop sustainable biosolids manag
ement programs. We conducted this study to (i) determine the availabil
ity and fate of biosolids N applied to a dryland soft-white winter whe
at (Triticum aestivum L.)-fallow rotation, (ii) determine if N availab
ility predictions for biosolids are applicable under dryland condition
s, and (10) make practical recommendations for biosolids management. W
e applied dewatered (21-30% solids) biosolids (4.3-5.5% total N; 257-8
53 lb N/acre) to on-farm test plots at three locations in the 9-12 in.
rainfall zone of eastern Washington. Fertilized (anhydrous or aqua am
monia [AA]) and unfertilized treatments were established at each site
for comparison. We measured yield and N uptake of grain and straw at h
arvest, and determined soil profile nitrate N (plus ammonium N, 0-12 i
n. depth only) before application, during fallow, and post-harvest. We
determined apparent N recovery from the soil at the end of the fallow
(ANR(fallow)). Nitrogen release from biosolids as measured by ANR(fal
low) was dependable and consistent over the three sites, despite diffe
rences in environment among the sites. ANR(fallow) averaged 29%, simil
ar to predicted values of 26-31%. The lowest biosolids rates (257-330
lb/acre) supplied more available N than AA. Yield, grain N, and flag l
eaf N all indicate that N was sufficient at the lowest biosolids rates
used, and that higher levels of biosolids did not benefit the crop. D
rawbacks to higher rates include risks of reduced crop yield (from moi
sture stress) and quality (from increased protein), and increased risk
of nitrate movement below the root zone. Storage of nitrate in the so
il profile does not appear to be a reliable strategy for supplying N f
or a second crop. Lower biosolids rates seem to reduce economic risks
to the farmer and reduce leaching risk Evaluation of low biosolids rat
es (10-300 lb total N/acre) and second crop response will be valuable
in refining biosolids application recommendations.