Ad. Fox et J. Madsen, BEHAVIORAL AND DISTRIBUTIONAL EFFECTS OF HUNTING DISTURBANCE ON WATERBIRDS IN EUROPE - IMPLICATIONS FOR REFUGE DESIGN, Journal of Applied Ecology, 34(1), 1997, pp. 1-13
1. Based on studies of effects of hunting disturbance on local waterbi
rd distribution and abundance, freedom from such disturbance is conclu
ded to be an important part of waterbird management on nature conserva
tion areas. Measures to mitigate the effects of disturbance from hunti
ng are reviewed. These include complete removal of hunting in refuges,
as well as spatial and temporal regulation of hunting activity in res
erve areas outwith hunting-free refuges. 2. Disturbance-free refuge de
sign should take account of the ecological requirements of all species
using a site and the functional units required to meet all daily acti
vities, especially primary feeding and roosting areas used by waterbir
ds. Refuge size and shape must ensure birds are free from the effects
of external disturbance. The most effective are of regular shape, maxi
mum practicable size, and as a minimum should have a diameter of three
times the escape flight distance of the most sensitive species presen
t. 3. Zoning in non-refuge areas can increase local bird numbers by re
stricting disturbance to regular predictable stimuli to which habituat
ion is more likely. Mobile hunting activity close to roosting and/or f
eeding areas is more disturbing than hunting from fixed points or wher
e birds are shot moving between such areas. Intermittent hunting is no
t an effective means of minimizing disturbance, but where implemented
rest periods between hunting events should be considered in weeks rath
er than days. 4. Most studies of mitigation techniques to minimize hun
ting disturbance have been descriptive and retrospective. Manipulative
studies testing specific hypotheses are essential to create a sound s
cientific base for management. 5. Management of hunting activity shoul
d take place within a broader management planning framework that ident
ifies ideal and operational objectives in the management of the site,
including feedback monitoring to determine the effectiveness of manage
ment prescriptions. 6. We recommend that local site management plannin
g should be integrated internationally, especially in the planning of
refuge networks along migration corridors. Management actions in one p
art of a flyway may affect the ability of areas elsewhere to meet obli
gations to biodiversity conservation and maintenance of range under in
ternational law. In populations that are limited by winter resources,
creation of a refuge network may offer a mechanism to enhance populati
on size, but more large scale density dependence studies are required
to confirm this.