CLOMIPHENE ANALOGS WITH ACTIVITY IN-VITRO AND IN-VIVO AGAINST HUMAN BREAST-CANCER CELLS

Citation
Rj. Baumann et al., CLOMIPHENE ANALOGS WITH ACTIVITY IN-VITRO AND IN-VIVO AGAINST HUMAN BREAST-CANCER CELLS, Biochemical pharmacology, 55(6), 1998, pp. 841-851
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy",Biology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00062952
Volume
55
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
841 - 851
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-2952(1998)55:6<841:CAWAIA>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Six hundred triphenylethylenes were assayed for antiproliferative acti vity against MCF-7, LY2, and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells using sulf orhodamine B dye to measure proliferation. Here we report on just 63 o f the compounds, mostly clomiphene analogs, with substitutions on the alpha' or beta ring, at the vinyl position or in the side chain, of wh ich 23 were active, as defined by antiproliferation IC50 values less t han or equal to 1 mu M Activity profiles showed that 23 and 11 analogs were active toward MCF-7 and LY2, respectively, but none were active against MDA-MB-231. The IC50 values of tamoxifen were 2.0 mu M against MCF-7 and 7.5 mu M against LY2 and MDA-MB-231. Estradiol reversed ant iproliferative activities of several E isomers but not their Z isomer counterparts. Clomiphene side chain analogs 46 [(E)-1-butanamine, 4-[4 -(2-chloro-1,2-diphenylethenyl) phenoxy]-N,N-diethyl-dihydrogen citrat e (MDL 103,323)] and 57 [(E)-N-[p-(2-chloro-1,2-diphenylvinyl) phenyl- N,N-diethylethylenediamine dihydrogen citrate (MDL 101,986)] were 4- t o 5-fold more effective than tamoxifen. Methylene additions up to (-CH 2-)(12) in the clomiphene side chain showed that analog 46 [(-CH2-)(4) side chain] had maximal antiproliferative activity, binding affinity, and inhibition of transcription of an estrogen response element lucif erase construct in transfected MCF-7 cells. Intraperitoneal administra tion of 46 or 57 inhibited progression of MCF-7 breast tumor xenograft s in nude mice with ED50 values of <0.02 mg/mouse/day. Both analogs ma y hold promise for treating ER positive breast cancer and are of inter est for further development. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.