A. Dellabona et Jb. Summitt, THE EFFECT OF AMALGAM BONDING ON RESISTANCE FORM OF CLASS-II AMALGAM RESTORATIONS, Quintessence international, 29(2), 1998, pp. 95-101
Objective: This study evaluated the load required to produce failure i
n Class II bonded amalgam restorations. Method and materials: Five gro
ups of 12 maxillary molars were mounted. Class II mesio-occlusal prepa
rations were cut: group I, extension through central grooves, without
retention grooves, group 2, proximal slot preparation, without retenti
on grooves; groups 3 and 5, slot preparation with long facial and ling
ual retention grooves, group 4, slot preparation without grooves, with
unsupported proximal enamel allowed to remain. Groups 1 to 4 were res
tored with an amalgam-bonding system and amalgam; in group 5, no amalg
am-bonding material was used. Results: Mean (SD) failure loads: group
1, 281 (77) N; group 2, 246 (101) N; group 3, 238 (84) N; group 4, 254
(100) N; and group 5, 191 (66) N. Conclusion: Although there was a tr
end toward greater resistance to dislodgment or fracture when an amalg
am-bonding technique was used, its use did not significantly increase
the resistance to failure when compared to retention grooves alone.