D. Giugliano et al., EFFECTS OF PERINDOPRIL AND CARVEDILOL ON ENDOTHELIUM-DEPENDENT VASCULAR FUNCTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETES AND HYPERTENSION, Diabetes care, 21(4), 1998, pp. 631-636
OBJECTIVE- To compare the effects of the ACE inhibitor perindopril and
the beta-blocker carvedilol on blood pressure and endothelial functio
ns in NIDDM patients with hypertension. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS- W
e conducted a double-blind randomized trial in 26 patients with NIDDM
and mild hypertension. A 4-week run-in placebo period preceded the act
ive 12-week treatment with perindopril (4-8 mg daily) or carvedilol (2
5-50 mg daily). Endothelial functions were assessed by evaluating the
hemodynamic (mean blood pressure, leg blood flow) and rheological (pla
telet aggregation, blood viscosity, and blood filterability) responses
to an intravenous bolus of 3 g L-arginine, the natural precursor of n
itric oxide. RESULTS- Both perindopril and carvedilol significantly re
duced mean blood pressure (P < 0.001) and increased leg blood now (P <
0.05) to the same extent; blood filterability remained unchanged in b
oth perindopril-and carvedilol-treated groups. Carvedilol reduced plat
elet aggregation and blood viscosity significantly (P < 0.05) but peri
ndopril did not. Before treatment, the hemodynamic and theologic respo
nses to L-arginine were significantly lower in patients (P < 0.05-0.01
) than in 20 nondiabetic nonhypertensive control subjects. After 12 we
eks of treatment, both drugs normalized the hemodynamic responses to L
-arginine. Platelet aggregation response to L-arginine was ameliorated
by carvedilol and remained unchanged in the perindopril group. CONCLU
SIONS- At the doses used, both drugs effectively reduce blood pressure
and normalize the hemodynamic responses to L-arginine. The implicatio
ns of the ameliorated endothelial function for the poor cardiovascular
outlook of the NIDDM hypertensive patient need further assessment.