Tme. Davis et al., ARRHYTHMIAS AND MORTALITY AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION IN DIABETIC-PATIENTS - RELATIONSHIP TO DIABETES TREATMENT, Diabetes care, 21(4), 1998, pp. 637-640
OBJECTIVE- To assess the relationship between clinical course after ac
ute myocardial infarction (AMI) and diabetes treatment. RESEARCH DESIG
N AND METHODS- Retrospective analysis of data from all patients aged 2
5-64 years admitted to hospitals in Perth, Australia, between 1985 and
1993 with AMI diagnosed according to the International Classification
of Diseases (9th revision) criteria was conducted. Short- (28-day) an
d long-term survival and complications in diabetic and nondiabetic pat
ients were compared. For diabetic patients, 28-day survival, dysrhythm
ias, heart block, and pulmonary edema were treated as outcomes, and fa
ctors related to each were assessed using multiple logistic regression
. Diabetes treatment was added to the model to assess its significance
. Long-term survival was compared by means of a Cox proportional hazar
ds model. RESULTS- Of 5,715 patients, 745 (12.9%) were diabetic. Morta
lity at 28 days was 12.0 and 28.1% for nondiabetic and diabetic patien
ts, respectively (P < 0.001); there were no significant drug effects i
n the diabetic group. Ventricular fibrillation in diabetic patients ta
king glibenclamide (11.8%) was similar to that of nondiabetic patients
(11.0%) but was lower than that for those patients taking either glic
lazide (18.0%; 0.1 > P > 0.05) or insulin (22.8%; P < 0.05). There wer
e no other treatment-related differences in acute complications. Long-
term survival in diabetic patients was reduced in those taking digital
is and/or diuretics but type of diabetes treatment at discharge had no
significant association with outcome. CONCLUSlONS- These results do n
ot suggest that ischemic heart disease should influence the choice of
diabetes treatment regimen in general or of sulfonylurea drug in parti
cular.