HETEROGENEITY IN THE OCCURRENCE OF A SUBSET OF AUTOANTIBODIES TO GLUTAMIC-ACID DECARBOXYLASE IN AUTOIMMUNE POLYENDOCRINE PATIENTS WITH ISLET-CELL ANTIBODIES
C. Davenport et al., HETEROGENEITY IN THE OCCURRENCE OF A SUBSET OF AUTOANTIBODIES TO GLUTAMIC-ACID DECARBOXYLASE IN AUTOIMMUNE POLYENDOCRINE PATIENTS WITH ISLET-CELL ANTIBODIES, Clinical and experimental immunology, 111(3), 1998, pp. 497-505
Glutamic acid decarboxylase-65 (GAD-65) is a major target for autoanti
bodies and autoreactive T cells in patients with insulin-dependent dia
betes mellitus (IDDM). Autoantibodies to GAD are also found in patient
s with stiff man syndrome (SMS) or polyendocrine autoimmunity (PE). Th
e epitope specificities of autoantibodies to GAB in IDDM and SMS have
been well documented, but the locations of autoantibody epitopes of GA
D in PE patients have not been mapped. Thus, the properties of anti-GA
D antibodies in PE patients (with or without diabetes) were investigat
ed. The ability of PE serum antibodies to inhibit the binding of the m
ouse monoclonal antibody, GAD-6, to native GAD in ELISA was determined
. For PE patients without diabetes, levels of inhibition of GAD-6 bind
ing ranged from 0% to almost 70% and were unrelated to the level of bi
nding of serum antibodies to GAD (P = 0.351) or to the functional affi
nities of these antibodies. This suggests differences in the epitope s
pecificities of anti-GAD antibodies in different patients. Levels of i
nhibition were also unrelated to clinical condition. SMS antibodies sh
owed similar levels of inhibition of GAD-6 binding. Similar analysis w
as applied to PE patients with diabetes and levels of inhibition of GA
D-6 binding to GAD were determined. These ranged from 0% to 80%, and l
evels of inhibition were similar in samples taken before or after diab
etes onset. There was no significant difference between anti-GAD antib
odies from PE patients with or without diabetes in the range of abilit
ies to inhibit GAD-6 binding to GAD, although the highest levels of in
hibition were given by sera from non-diabetic patients. This raises th
e possibility of differential expression of subsets of anti-GAD antibo
dies in progressive versus slow or non-progressive anti-islet autoimmu
ne responses. Serum antibodies of PE and SMS patients did not inhibit
the binding of antibodies specific for the extreme C-terminus of GAD,
indicating that this is not the site of the epitopes for the patients'
antibodies or for GAD-6.