Crystallite size determination of MoS2 particles is still a controvers
ial problem fuelling the debate on the morphology of hydro-treating ca
talysts, The size of MoS2 crystallites determined from extended X-ray
absorption fine structures (EXAFS) is close to 1 nm, whereas TEM pictu
re analysis give an average size of 3 to 3 mo, It is obvious that thes
e techniques have intrinsic strengths and weaknesses and that the resu
lts may not be comparable because of these differences, However, it is
our intention to obtain a better understanding of these crystallite s
izes by studying the dispersed unsupported solids, Various techniques
were used: nitrogen adsorption-desorption, X-hay diffraction (XRD), XA
FS, TEM, and temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) and the results we
re compared and discussed, The samples were prepared by thiosalt decom
position or molten salt synthesis, These solids presented different mo
rphologies, the latter method providing higher surface area samples. T
he specific surface areas varied from 4 to 125 m(2)/g and, depending o
n the method of preparation, microporous and mesoporous solids were ob
tained. XRD, TEM, and TPR were found to be complementary and coherent
methods for determining the size parameter, EXAFS interpretation does
not give consistent results due to local reorganization at the periphe
ry of the crystallites, (C) 1998 Academic Press.