A comparison is made between the effectiveness of the inversion of bor
ehole temperature data (for the purpose of climate reconstruction) by
the least-squares (L-2) technique and the minimization of the absolute
difference between the observed and calculated data (L-1) technique.
The L-1 technique is found to require approximately half the number of
iterations to reach the practically achievable minimum error compared
to the L-2 technique. The choice of which technique to use depends on
the statistics of the difference between the observed and calculated
data, and it can be advantageous to switch techniques during the inver
sion process. The inversion damping is also adjusted during the course
of the inversion, based on the rate of change of the difference betwe
en the observed and calculated data. The aim is to get the best fit of
the model to the data while minimising the model size, in the minimum
number of iterations. A method of adjusting the damping to achieve th
is is suggested.