The article reviews the current study of the European Union (EU), wher
e a new agenda is emerging under the umbrella oi 'new governance'. Des
pite its eclecticism, this agenda argues that the EU is not a state, b
ut is a unique system of nan-hierarchical, regulatory and deliberative
governance. This agenda also conceptualizes the EU as sui generis, ex
plains its development primarily by (new) institutional theory, and su
ggests that legitimacy is guaranteed through transparent, pareto-effic
ient and consensual outputs. Nevertheless, this agenda is open to crit
icism on empirical, methodological, theoretical and normative levels.
Such a dialectic suggests a new duality in the study of the EU: betwee
n the new governance approach, and a less developed rival agenda, whic
h treats EU politics and government as not inherently unique, compares
the EU to other political systems, explains outcomes through rational
strategic action, and suggests that legitimacy can be guaranteed thro
ugh classic democratic competition over inputs.