DETERMINATION OF REFERENCE METHOD VALUES BY ISOTOPE-DILUTION GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY MASS-SPECTROMETRY - A 5 YEARS EXPERIENCE OF 2 EUROPEAN REFERENCE LABORATORIES
Lm. Thienpont et al., DETERMINATION OF REFERENCE METHOD VALUES BY ISOTOPE-DILUTION GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY MASS-SPECTROMETRY - A 5 YEARS EXPERIENCE OF 2 EUROPEAN REFERENCE LABORATORIES, European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry, 34(10), 1996, pp. 853-860
We report on the cooperation of two European Reference Laboratories fo
r the determination of reference method values in serum based material
s intended for use in internal accuracy control and external quality a
ssessment. Reference method values were determined by isotope dilution
-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for aldosterone, cortisol, oestr
adioI-17 beta, progesterone, testosterone, thyroxine, theophylline, ch
olesterol, creatinine, glucose, total triacylglycerols and uric acid.
All determinations were done in parallel in the two laboratories, inde
pendently and within certain time constraints. The general measurement
design consisted of duplicate measurement of each sample on three dif
ferent occasions. In each laboratory, rigorous internal quality contro
l was performed according to predefined analytical quality specificati
ons. This was done using certified reference materials. If not availab
le, control materials targeted before by the two laboratories were uti
lized. Here we present the results of the cooperation during five year
s. We discuss the precision and accuracy achieved, the between-laborat
ory agreement and the total analytical error. For the hormones and the
ophylline, the mean overall coefficient of variation for both laborato
ries (calculated from the measurements on three days) was always < 2%,
for the substrates < 1%. For all substances, the method bias (estimat
ed from several measurement series over the five years) was < 1%, and
the average deviation of the results between the two laboratories was
< 1.2%. The maximum total analytical error was in all cases < 3%. Thes
e data demonstrate that current reference methodology is able to guara
ntee a stable level of high quality of performance, and that reference
laboratories of today are capable of providing, in due time, adequate
service in the framework of accuracy-based harmonization of methods i
n routine laboratory medicine.