CLINICAL, FUNCTIONAL, AND RADIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENTS OF THE CONVENTIONAL AND MODIFIED BOYD-ANDERSON SURGICAL-PROCEDURES FOR REPAIR OF DISTAL BICEPS TENDON RUPTURES
P. Darco et al., CLINICAL, FUNCTIONAL, AND RADIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENTS OF THE CONVENTIONAL AND MODIFIED BOYD-ANDERSON SURGICAL-PROCEDURES FOR REPAIR OF DISTAL BICEPS TENDON RUPTURES, American journal of sports medicine, 26(2), 1998, pp. 254-261
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical, functional, an
d radiographic outcomes of the conventional and modified Boyd-Anderson
procedures for repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures. Thirteen of 1
8 men who underwent surgical repair for unilateral distal biceps tendo
n ruptures at one university center participated in the study. In gene
ral, follow-up outcomes were favorable with respect to return to premo
rbid activity levels, patient satisfaction with surgical outcome, and
overall clinical results. Elbow flexion, forearm supination, and upper
extremity functional concentric peak torque and range of motion resul
ts were not significantly different between the surgical and nonsurgic
al arms when dominance was controlled as a confounding factor. Radiogr
aphic findings revealed no clinically remarkable signs of heterotopic
ossification or proximal radioulnar synostosis. Results of the study r
eveal that the conventional and modified Boyd-Anderson procedures are
clinically, functionally, and radiographically efficacious for repair
of distal biceps tendon ruptures.