A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF OMEPRAZOLE SUSPENSION TO PREVENT CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT GASTROINTESTINAL-BLEEDING FROM STRESS-ULCERS IN MECHANICALLYVENTILATED TRAUMA PATIENTS
Mr. Lasky et al., A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF OMEPRAZOLE SUSPENSION TO PREVENT CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT GASTROINTESTINAL-BLEEDING FROM STRESS-ULCERS IN MECHANICALLYVENTILATED TRAUMA PATIENTS, The journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 44(3), 1998, pp. 527-533
Objective: To prospectively evaluate the incidence of clinically signi
ficant bleeding, side effects, and cost of therapy in mechanically ven
tilated trauma patients at high risk for stress ulcers who received si
mplified omeprazole suspension (SOS). Methods: Prospective, evaluative
study in a Level I trauma center. Mechanically ventilated trauma pati
ents admitted with at least one additional risk factor for stress ulce
r development received SOS for stress ulcer prophylaxis. Results: Sixt
y trauma patients were enrolled. The mean Injury Severity Score was 27
.3. After starting SOS, there were no cases of clinically significant
upper gastrointestinal bleeding related to stress ulceration. Baseline
pH was 3.3, and mean gastric pH after SOS was increased to 6.7 (p < 0
.005). There were no adverse effects thought to be related to omeprazo
le suspension. Incidence of nosocomial pneumonia after beginning SOS w
as 28.3%. The cost of acquisition plus administration of SOS was $13.1
3 per day, whereas the cost of drug acquisition alone was $3.83 per da
y. Conclusion: In a prospective, evaluative study of 60 trauma patient
s who required mechanical ventilation and had at least one additional
risk factor for stress ulcer development, omeprazole suspension preven
ted clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding, maintained excel
lent control of gastric pH, produced no toxicity, and was the least co
stly medication alternative.