Sd. Poppitt et al., ASSESSMENT OF SELECTIVE UNDER-REPORTING OF FOOD-INTAKE BY BOTH OBESE AND NONOBESE WOMEN IN A METABOLIC FACILITY, International journal of obesity, 22(4), 1998, pp. 303-311
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the degree of bias in under-reporting of foo
d intake in obese and non-obese subjects, hypothesising that under-rep
orting may be selective for either macronutrient content (carbohydrate
(CHO), fat, protein, alcohol), specific food types or eating occasion
s (meals, snacks). DESIGN: Thirty-three women (18 obese, 15 non-obese)
were recruited to a long-stay metabolic facility for 24 h. Ad libitum
food intake was covertly measured throughout the study and a reported
food intake completed at the end of 24 h. RESULTS: Reported total dai
ly energy intake was significantly lower than measured intake. Whilst
meals were accurately reported, energy from snack foods eaten between
meals was significantly under-reported. (P < 0.001) Reported total car
bohydrate and added sugar intakes were significantly lower than measur
ed, whilst reported protein and fat intakes were not significantly dif
ferent from measured. Reported alcohol intake was also considerably lo
wer than measured, but high variability prevented significance. CONCLU
SIONS: In both obese and non-obese women the major cause of under-repo
rting, as assessed by covert study design in subjects restricted withi
n a metabolic facility, is the failure to report between-meal snack fo
ods. There is some evidence for increased under-reporting in high CHO,
but no evidence of a bias in under-reporting towards high fat or high
protein foods.