The study of small bowel motility in humans is commonly done by one of
two techniques: short-term recording in a stationary patient or long-
term recording in an ambulatory patient, To compare the diagnostic yie
ld of short- and long-term manometric studies of small intestinal moti
lity, we reviewed all prolonged records performed in our center over t
he years, Long-term studies that included less than 6 hr of recording
during fasting or less than 5 hr during sleep and short-term studies u
sing the perfused tube technique were excluded, leaving 91/121 tracing
s suitable for review, We analyzed the first 3 hr of the fasting perio
d and the first 2 hr of the postprandial period on one occasion and th
e whole tracing on another; the fasting, postprandial and sleep period
were analyzed separately. This allowed us to compare short and long r
ecording sessions in the same patient. The mio analyses agreed in 81/9
1 of the cases. In 7/10 patients a study was diagnosed as abnormal in
the short recording but was considered normal after review of the long
recording, while the opposite occurred in the remaining three, Period
s of sleep and fasting contributed similarly to the change in diagnosi
s. In another 6 patients with equivocal abnormalities during the short
period, the long period helped to establish the diagnosis of normalit
y with confidence, Most of the improvement in the long-term study came
from extension of the studies during fasting to 6-7 hr from 3 hr. Lon
g-term records of small bowel motility, including study during sleep e
nhance the diagnostic accuracy of the test. Accuracy can be improved a
lso simply by prolonging the recording during fasting.