It is demonstrated that the simplified analysis of Rutherford backscat
tering\channeling data on damage production in SiC performed by Grimal
di et al. [J. Appl, Phys, 81, 7181 (1997)] cannot be used to calculate
the atomic displacement energy. The value of 12 eV at which the autho
rs arrive is much too small. Moreover, their conclusion of similar dis
placement energies in Si and SiC is essentially wrong. The general rea
sons for that are discussed and illustrated by an example. (C) 1998 Am
erican Institute of Physics. [S0021-8979(98)01607-7].