Nw. Hendrix et al., CLINICAL AND SONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATES OF BIRTH-WEIGHT AMONG DIABETIC PARTURIENTS, Journal of maternal-fetal investigation, 8(1), 1998, pp. 17-20
Objective: To determine the relative accuracy of clinical and sonograp
hic estimates of fetal weight (EFW) among parturients with diabetes re
quiring insulin (White's classifications A2 and higher). Methods: In e
arly labor, clinical EFW was followed by sonographic mensuration of fe
tal parts, At the completion of the study, sonographic EFW was calcula
ted using abdominal circumference and femur length. Student's t test,
Wilcoxan test, and chi square test were used to assess the relative ac
curacy of the two methods of assessing birth weight. Results: Among 94
parturients with various classifications of diabetes, the clinical es
timate of birth weight has a significantly higher simple error (-180.3
+ 419.5 g) but not a significantly higher mean standardized absolute
error (130.7 +/- 130.1 g/kg) than sonographic prediction (-139.3 +/- 4
47.1 g, 115.6 +/- 90.8 g/kg, respectively). Analysis of the data, acco
rding to gestational age, indicates that clinical EFW is more accurate
than sonographic EFW among term (n = 67) parturients with diabetes, b
ut both methods are comparable in preterm (n = 27) parturients. Howeve
r, when the data are analyzed according to birth weight, EFW by Leopol
d maneuvers is significantly more accurate than those obtained sonogra
phically in infants weighing 2500-3999 g (n = 66) and >4000 g (n = 12)
. Conclusion: In term gestations of diabetic mothers and those infants
with a birth weight of 2500 g or more, the clinical estimate of birth
weight is more accurate; however, in preterm diabetic pregnancies, cl
inical and sonographic estimates are equal.