INTERCOMPARISON OF THE GAS-PHASE CHEMISTRY IN SEVERAL CHEMISTRY AND TRANSPORT MODELS

Citation
M. Kuhn et al., INTERCOMPARISON OF THE GAS-PHASE CHEMISTRY IN SEVERAL CHEMISTRY AND TRANSPORT MODELS, Atmospheric environment, 32(4), 1998, pp. 693-709
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Environmental Sciences","Metereology & Atmospheric Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
13522310
Volume
32
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
693 - 709
Database
ISI
SICI code
1352-2310(1998)32:4<693:IOTGCI>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
An intercomparison of nine chemical mechanisms (e.g. ADOM, CBM-IV, EME P, RADMZ) as used by 12 contributing groups was conducted. The results for three scenarios are presented covering remote situations with a n et O-3 loss of around 2.7 ppb, (LAND and FREE) and a moderately pollut ed situation with O-3 formation of around 100 ppb (PLUME1) over a 5 da y simulation period. The overall tendencies (i.e. the total net produc tion/loss over 5 days) for O-3 show a r.m.s. error of 38, 15 and 16%; for H2O2 the errors are 76, 23 and 30% (for LAND, FREE, PLUME1). In te rms of ozone production in PLUME1, the most productive mechanisms are EMEP and IVL, the RADM-type mechanisms lie in the mid-range and the CB M-IV type mechanisms fall at the bottom of the range. The differences in H2O2 can partly be explained by an incorrect use of the HO2 + HO2 r ate constant and by differences in the treatment of the peroxy radical interactions. In the PLUME1 case the r.m.s. error of the PAN tendency was found to be 29%. Differences between mechanisms for the HO radica l are 10, 15 and 19% and for the NO3 radical 35, 16 and 40% (for LAND, FREE, PLUME1) in terms of the r.m.s. error of the results for a 12 h time period centred around the last noon (HO), respectively, a 8 h tim e period centred around the last midnight (NO3) of simulation. Especia lly for NO3 some differences are due to different numerical treatment of photolytic processes in the models. Large differences between mecha nisms are observed for higher organic peroxides and higher aldehydes w ith a r.m.s. error of around 50% for the final concentration in PLUME1 . The protocol of the intercomparison is given in the appendix, so tha t the comparison could be repeated for the purpose of mechanism develo pment and sensitivity studies. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All righ ts reserved.