F. Faulkner et L. Pettiford, COMPLEXITY AND SIMPLICITY - LANDMINES, PEACE AND SECURITY IN CENTRAL-AMERICA, Third world quarterly, 19(1), 1998, pp. 45-61
The basic argument put forward is that whilst the security debate with
in international relations has made important advances, especially, in
developing ontological and epistemological challenges, complexity in
intellectual endeavour cannot hide the simple truth of insecurity felt
by post-war communities living in the context of landmines. Since lan
dmines have traditionally been regarded as a legitimate weapon in the
search for national (military) security this very practical issue seem
s to have evaded the increasingly theoretical excursions of a discipli
ne desperate to catch up and show its credibility in this area. Furthe
rmore, actual studies of landmines have tended to concentrate on certa
in areas implying the problem less widespread than it actually, is. Ac
cordingly, this article adumbrates recent theoretical developments in
security and stresses their importance. However it also seeks to stres
s the importance of action in the real world; it does this in part by
looking at the issues of landmines in the post-conflict situations of
Nicaragua and El Salvador.