CUMULATION, EVALUATION AND THE RESEARCH PROCESS - INVESTIGATING THE DIFFUSION OF CONFLICT

Broad analytic assessments of research areas can be invaluable for sch olars because they can inform the ongoing feedback process between the ory and research that is at the heart of scientific inquiry. Unfortuna tely, Simowitz's (1998) evaluation of diffusion analyses of conflict h as several problematic characteristics that make it less useful to the research community than might otherwise be the case. The major diffic ulties we see in her article are: (I) the forced, idiosyncratic synthe sis of the standard of scientific progress and its consequent applicat ion; (2) the excessively unilinear conception of scientific process (a nd progress); (3) the inaccurate understanding of some of the research on war diffusion; (4) the failure to include in the evaluation severa l studies and results that might have led to different conclusions; an d (5) the absence of any constructive suggestion of where research on the topic of war and conflict diffusion might profitably be directed.