Em. Targarona et al., HOW, WHEN, AND WHY BILE-DUCT INJURY OCCURS - A COMPARISON BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY, Surgical endoscopy, 12(4), 1998, pp. 322-326
Background: Bile duct injury (BDI) is a severe complication of laparos
copic cholecystectomy (LC). There is general agreement about the incre
ase of this complication after LC vs open cholecystectomy (OC), but co
mparative studies are scarce. The aim of this paper has been to compar
e the incidence and clinical features of BDI after LC vs open procedur
es. Materials and methods: 3,051 OC, performed from June 1977 to Decem
ber 1988 were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 1,630 LCs per
formed from June 91 to August 96, for which data were prospectively re
corded. Age, sex, type of BDI, performance of intraoperative cholangio
graphy (IOC), underlying biliary pathology, morbidity, mortality, and
late morbidity were all analyzed. Results: BDI incidence was higher in
group II (LC) (N: 16, 0.95%) than in group I, (OC, N: 19, 0.6%). BDI
incidence was also higher in the group of patients in which it was nec
essary to convert to an open procedure (3/109, 2.7%, p < 0.05). BDIs w
ere more frequently diagnosed intraoperatively in group I (OC, 18/19)
than in group II (LC, 12/16). In both groups, BDI was more prevalent i
n cases operated by staff surgeons than residents, mainly in complicat
ed gallbladder patients, with a bile duct of less than 7-mm diameter.
Morbidity, postoperative stay, mortality, and late morbidity were simi
lar after a BDI in both types of approach. Conclusion: (1) BDI increas
es with LC. (2) BDI after LC carries a similar postoperative morbidity
and mortality to those after OC. (3) Incidence of BDI in converted ca
ses increases significantly and this constitutes a high-risk group.